Leonardo DiCaprio as FBI director J. Edgar Hoover. |
Photo shows Hoover at about 22 years old. |
But in truth, I found Hoover -- at least the younger one I wrote about in my book -- to be oddly sympathetic. Hoover did not step into the world as an evil villain. To a great extent, this side of him was shaped by events and forces that engulfed him during his lifetime, especially his younger formative years. This is not to make excuses for Hoover's very long record on the dark side, but simply dismissing him as a cartoon villain and cross-dresser misses the deeper lessons.
Hoover came to work at the Justice Department in 1917 as a eager, bright young man ready to impress his superiors and save the country. Within four short years, he had risen to become deputy director of the Bureau of Investigation and had already played a lead role in the Palmer Raids, one of the most eggregious civil liberties abuses in US history. This transformation -- from bright young man to hardened bureaucrat --fascinated me, especially since, to my eye, post-9/11 America seemed to be a period not unlike Hoover's own formative years during the 1919-1920 Red Scare. It is a core theme of my own book Young J. Edgar, and, based on the trailer, it also seems to be at the heart of the new film.
I have been following the Eastwood-DiCaprio project for months through news reports and Washington gossip. I was impressed early on by two things--
- First, the writer, Dustin Lance Black, who also wrote the screenplay for Milk (the movie about assassinated San Francisco supervisor Harvey Milk), reportedly spent several months in Washington while developing the script doing primary research at the National Archives and Library of Congress. To understand J. Edgar Hoover, there is no substitute for seeing the FBI files. They are simply stunning, a dazzling reflection of the man who created them. They make endlessly fascinating reading and paint a stark portrait of absolute power breeding absolute corruption.
- Second, when the movie crew came to Washington, D.C. last May, one place they filmed was at the Library of Congress, one of my own favorite research haunts. I heard many stories from friends there about the movie crew and how they did their work: their eye for detail, making a point to show, for instance, Hoover/DiCaprio's fascination with the Library's card catalogue. The real-life Hoover actually worked at the Library of Congress during law school in 1914-17 and its card cataloue was a key inspiration for him in designing his FBI files.
I fully expect to have my own list of nit-picks and criticisms once I see the entire film in November. But for now, based on the trailer, I like what I see.
4 comments:
armanis-armani are smart psychiatrists since alma armanis attended iu and worked in the department of psychiatry (levitt,persky,armanis hydrocortisone.) armanis vs. hoover or hoover vs. armanis in psychiatry. fbi knows but wont tell you. hoover could never be a homosexual because armani - armanis are psychiatrists with alma.
why leo? Was is leo who approached and said I want this. Or was is it Eastwood? This is the most important question to me.
who went to who? Did leo go to eastwood or was it the other way around? This to me is the most important question.
who went to who? Did leo go to eastwood or was it the other way around? This to me is the most important question.
Post a Comment